Hardin-Simmons University Library - 153 Matching Results

Search Results

Results: 1 - 50 next
[Letter from Jane Y. McCallum to T. N. Carswell - July 17, 1931]
A letter addressed to Mr. T. N. Carswell, Secy., Chamber of Commerce, Abilene, Texas, from Jane Y. McCallum, Secretary of State, Austin, Texas, dated July 17, 1931. Cover letter by McCallum advising of an enclosed certificate showing the dissolution of the "WEST TEXAS AUTOMOBILE CLUB".
[Warranty Deed. The State of Texas, County of Taylor between May Sears and Ernie Ramey.]
A Warranty Deed from The State of Texas, County of Taylor, dated May 16th 1931, between May Sears and Ernie Ramey. $229.00, Lot 1 Block 8 Arthur Sears Park Addition. The reverse side includes 4593 Warranty Deed. May Sears to Ernie Ramey dated May 16, 1931. Filed for Record October 22, 1934 by Vivian Fryar. The Trentman Co Realtors, Fort Worth, Texas. || R. Peters, Notary Public, Taylor County, Texas.
[Cause No. 6080-A: Defendants' Fourth Amended Original Answer to Plaintiff's First Amended Original Petition]
Document in cause no. 6080-A, A. D. Fulton vs. Gulf Pipe Line Company et al., discussing the complaints brought by A. D. Fulton and countering his claims of damage to his property by the Gulf Pipe Line Company and the Gulf Production Company. There are several notes written on the back of the last page. This document is unsigned.
[Notes Discussing Fulton vs. Gulf Sept. 9-1931]
Paper with notes discussing the cause, "Fulton vs. Gulf," likely referring to A. D. Fulton vs. Gulf Pipe Line Company et al., Cause No. 6080-A.
[Letter to David W. Stephens, September 16, 1931]
Letter to David W. Stephens, discussing a draft of the judgment in the case, "A.D. Fulton vs. Gulf Pipe Line Oil Company et al."
[Letter from Sayles & Sayles to David W. Stephens, September 5, 1931]
Letter from Sayles & Sayles to David W. Stephens discussing the cause, Gulf Pipe Line Company vs. A. D. Fulton. It states the only document in the clerks office is the order of continuation and some details of the juror list.
[Letter from David W. Stephens to John Sayles, May 15, 1931]
Letter from David W. Stephens to John Sayles discussing Sayles legal fee in the case "A. D. Fulton vs Gulf Pipe Line Company et. al." There is an additional handwritten note that continues on to the back of the letter.
[Letter to David W. Stephens, May 23, 1931]
Letter to David W. Stephens discussing the judgement in the courtcase, "A. D. Fulton vs. Gulf Pipe Line Company et al."
[Letter from David W. Stephens to John Sayles, February 9, 1931]
Letter from David W. Stephens to John Sayles discussing an amended decision in the case, "A.D. Fulton vs. Gulf Pipe Line Co. et al."
[Telegraph from John Sayles to David W. Stephens, May 30, 1931]
Letter from John Sayles to David W. Stephens, stating Sayles never received the "order Fulton case" and that he would be absent Monday to Thursday.
[Letter from David W. Stephens to John Sayles, September 1, 1931]
Letter from David W. Stephens to John Sayles discussing a terracing job to be done by Jim Gardner on property related to the A. D. Fulton vs. Gulf Pipe Line Company case.
[Letter from J. S. to David W. Stephens, September 15, 1931]
Letter from J. S. to David W. Stephens discussing the plaintiff's motion for a new trial in the cause no. 6080-A, A. D. Fulton vs. Gulf Pipe Line Company et al..
[Letter from David W. Stephens to John Sayles, September 15, 1931]
Letter from David W. Stephens to John Sayles delivering a judgment draft for the A. D. Fulton vs. Gulf Pipe Line Company case. If approved, Stephens is to have the court sign and enter the judgment. Handwritten text at the bottom of the letter: "P. S. Please also check which of our requests...were published. DWS."
[Letter from Henry Sayles Jr., E. B. Sayles, and C. M. Sayles, March 16, 1931]
Henry Sayles Jr., E. B. Sayles, and C. M. Sayles transferring ownership and outstanding obligations of all of Henry's lands to E. B. and C. M. Sayles.
[Letter from John Sayles to David W. Stephens, May 18,1931]
Letter from John Sayles to David W. Stephens discussing the payment for Sayles services in regards to the case of A. D. Fulton vs. Gulf Pipe Line Company.
[Notes Discussing A. D. Fulton vs. Gulf Pipe Line Company et al., November 14, 1931]
Paper with notes related to the cause, A. D. Fulton vs. Gulf Pipe Line Company et al..
[Cause No. 6080-A: Defendants' First Motion for Continuance]
Document in cause no. 6080-A, A. D. Fulton vs. Gulf Pipe Line Company et al., requesting a continuance of the trial due to the illness of James E. Gardner, a witness for the defendant.
[Notes Discussing Cause No. 6080-A]
Notes relating to cause no. 6080-A, A. D. Fulton vs. Gulf Pipe Line Company et al., discussing a special charge.
[Letter from John Sayles to David W. Stephens, September 23, 1931]
Letter from John Sayles to David W. Stephens discussing the judgment of the A. D. Fulton vs. Gulf Pipe Line Company case.
[Letter from Sayles & Sayles to David W. Stephens, September 3, 1931]
Letter from Sayles & Sayles to David W. Stephens remitting $25.00 for the following Tuesday.
[Letter from John Sayles to David W. Stephens, November 3, 1931]
Letter from John Sayles to David W. Stephens discussing the A. D. Fulton vs. Gulf Pipe Line Company et al. case. Sayles informs Stephens of reasonable fees.
[Cause No. 6080-A: Instructions to the Jury]
Document in cause no. 6080-A, A. D. Fulton vs. Gulf Pipe Line Company et al., providing the jury with instructions on how to consider the cause. There are several notes written on the back of the pages and this document appears to be a draft.
[Letter from David W. Stephens to John Sayles, October 26, 1931]
Letter from David W. Stephens to John Sayles discussing the Gulf Pipe Line Company vs. A.D. Fulton case. Stephens provide an order to continue the case and injunction.
[Cause No. 6080-A: Defendants' First Amended Original Answer]
Document in cause no. 6080-A: A. D. Fulton vs. Gulf Pipe Line Company et al., answering A. D. Fulton's complaints of the Gulf Pipe Line Company regarding damage to Fulton's land. This document is unsigned.
[Cause No. 6733-A: Order of Continuation and Temporary Injunction, May 12, 1931]
Document in cause no. 6733-A, Gulf Pipe Line Company vs. A. D. Fulton, granting an order of continuation and temporary injunction. The document is unsigned.
[Cause No. 6080-A: Plaintiff's Bill of Exception No. 1]
Document in cause no. 6080-A, A. D. Fulton vs. Gulf Pipe Line Company et al., discussing several portions of the court record the plaintiff requests to have excepted. This document is unsigned.
[Letter from David W. Stephens to John Sayles, November 2, 1931]
Letter from David W. Stephens to John Sayles discussing the A. D. Fulton vs. Gulf Pipe Line Company et al. case. The motion for new trial has been overruled.
[Letter to John Sayles, September 19, 1931]
Letter to John Sayles discussing the A. D. Fulton vs. Gulf Pipe Line Company case. The writer states that the verdict is incomplete. The writer provides evidence of cases where an incomplete verdict did not affect judgment.
[Clipping: Terracing Work Underway Here]
Newspaper clipping of the article, "Terracing Work Here Underway," discussing the terracing of Mark Merchant's farm.
[Letter from John Sayles to David W. Stephens, October 24, 1921]
Letter from John Sayles to David W. Stephens discussing the Gulf Pipe Line Company vs. A. D. Fulton case. The suit has been continued by agreement of the district court and is now engaged in the trial of a jury case.
[Letter from John Sayles to R. E. L. Batts, January 22, 1931]
Letter from John Sayles to R. E. L. Batts discussing Sayles' mother's land and confidential information in a previous letter.
[Clipping: Gulf Pipe Line Company v. Bailey, No. 3974]
Journal clipping discussing cause no. 3974, Gulf Pipe Line Company vs. John Bailey, in the Court of Civil Appeals of Texas, Texarkana, heard June 18, 1931 and denied a rehearing on July 4, 1931. The cause was brought by John Bailey to recover damages for the loss of a herd of cattle due to a levee break at the point where the Gulf Pipe Line Company's line crossed underneath the levee.
[Letter from John Sayles to P. O. Settle, November 12,1931]
Letter from John Sayles to P. O. Settle in which John Sayles thanks Settle for the payment voucher of $150.00 for legal services rendered by the Gulf Pipe Line Company.
[Cause No. 6733-A: Order of Continuation, October 1931]
Document in the cause no. 6733-A, Gulf Pipe Line Company vs. A. D. Fulton, granting a continuation of the cause to the next regular term of the court. This document is unsigned.
[Letter from C. L. Hailey to David W. Stephens, January 12, 1931]
Letter from C. L. Hailey to David W. Stephens discussing two suits by A. D. Fulton against the Gulf Pipe Line Company have been set for trial on February 17.
[Map of A. D. Fulton's Property]
Map of A. D. Fulton's property showing the lane and other details of the property.
[Letter from David W. Stephens to John Sayles, October 15, 1931]
Letter from David W. Stephens to John Sayles discussing the A. D. Fulton vs. Gulf Pipe Line Company case. Scarborough has motioned for new trial, but Sayles disagrees.
First Week
Paper titled "First Week" with a list of names and addresses, possibly in connection to the cause no. 6080-A, A. D. Fulton vs. Gulf Pipe Line Company et al.. There are fifty names with addresses.
[Letter from David W. Stephens to John Sayles, May 13, 1931]
Letter from David W. Stephens to John Sayles remitting an order for the Gulf Pipe Line Company vs. A. D. Fulton case.
[Letter from J. S. to David W. Stephens, September 22, 1931]
Letter from J. S. to David W. Stephens discussing the author presenting the judgement in the case, A. D. Fulton vs. Gulf Pipe Line Company et al., to Judge Long.
[Cause No. 6080-A: Instructions to the Jury]
Document in the cause no. 6080-A, A. D. Fulton vs. Gulf Pipe Line Company et al. instructing the jury on how to consider the cause including several specific questions.
[Letter from R. E. L. Batts to John Sayles, January 15, 1931]
Letter from R. E. L. Batts to John Sayles discussing the price to lease lands owned by Salyes' mother for oil and gas purposes. Batts says he has written the Houston office requesting information on the lands, as they are not in the Fort Worth District.
[Cause No. 8060-A: Plaintiff's Motion for New Trial]
Document in the cause no. 6080-A, A. D. Fulton vs. Gulf Pipe Line Company et al., requesting a new trial on several counts of error by the court.
[Lists of Names]
Document with a handwritten list of names, possibly related to the cause no. 6080-A, A. D. Fulton vs. Gulf Pipe Line Company et al.. The names are in alphabetical order, are numbered.
[Letter from John Sayles to R. E. L. Batts, January 12, 1931]
Letter from John Sayles to R. E. L. Batts discussing a five to ten year commercial oil and gas lease for his mother's land and requesting a valuation of such. Sayles mentions the total amount of land present and asks for any information that may be obtained regarding the lease.
[Questions to the Jury]
Paper with questions for the jury, likely related to the cause no. 6080-A, A. D. Fulton vs. Gulf Pipe Line Company et al., which ask the jury to determine damage to the plaintiff's land.
[Cause No. 6080-A: Judgement of the Jury]
Document in the cause, A. D. Fulton vs. Gulf Pipe Line Company et al., stating the decision of the jury in favor of the plaintiff, A. D. Fulton. This document is unsigned.
[Letter from John Sayles to David W. Stephens, May 27, 1931]
Letter from John Sayles to David W. Stephens discussing the new trial for A. D. Fulton vs. Gulf Pipe Line Company. Dallas Scarborough informed Sayles if the new trial is refused Fulton would be responsible for the cost of appeal. Scarborough also stated he would insist for the new trial to be taken up.
[Cause No. 8060-A: Bill of Exception]
Document in cause no. 6080-A, A. D. Fulton vs. Gulf Pipe Line Company et al., listing nine items the defendants are requesting to have excepted from the court records. This document is unsigned.
[Letter from John Sayles to David W. Stephens, August 28,1931]
Letter from John Sayles to David W. Stephens discussing a trial date for the case of Fulton vs. Gulf Pipe Line Company. John Sayles adds that the judge has stated he would have a jury summoned for this trial.
Back to Top of Screen