Hardin-Simmons University Library - 7 Matching Results

Search Results

[Cause No. 1485: Defendant Gulf Refining Company's Requested Charge No. 1]
Document in cause no. 1485, Sam Underwood et al. vs. Gulf Refining Company, requesting the court instruct the jury to find for the defendant, Gulf Refining Company.
[Cause No. 1485-B: Order Postponing Hearing]
Document in cause no. 1485-B, Sam Underwood et. al. vs. Gulf Refining Company, which postpones the hearing of defendant, N. E. Fielding's plea of privilege and the Gulf Refining Company's controverting plea from July 11, 1932 to July 13, 1932. This document is unsigned.
[Cause No. 1485-B: Order Postponing Hearing]
Document in cause no. 1485-B, Sam Underwood et. al. vs. Gulf Refining Company, which postpones the hearing of defendant, N. E. Fielding's plea of privilege and the Gulf Refining Company's controverting plea from July 11, 1932 to July 13, 1932.
[Cause No. 7863: Argument of Defendant Gulf Refining Company on Its Plea That N. E. Fielding Is a Necessary Party to This Suit]
Document in cause no. 7863, Sam Underwood et al. vs. Gulf Refining Company, describing the details of the suit and requesting that N. E. Fielding be added as a party to the suit. The Underwood heirs are suing the company for use a of warehouse on their property which was rented to the company by Fielding.
[Cause No. 1485-B: Defendant's Plea Controverting N. E. Fielding's Plea of Privilege]
Document in cause no. 1485-B, Sam Underwood et al. vs. Gulf Refining Company, which counters the arguments in N. E. Fielding's plea of privilege and stating that Fielding should not be a party to the suit.
[Cause No. 1485-B: Order Postponing Hearing]
Document in cause no. 1485-B, Sam Underwood et. al. vs. Gulf Refining Company, which postpones the hearing of defendant, N. E. Fielding's plea of privilege and the Gulf Refining Company's controverting plea from July 11, 1932 to July 13, 1932. This document is unsigned.
[Cause No. 7863: Court's Ruling on Plea to Make New Parties]
Document in cause no. 7863, Sam Underwood et al. vs. Gulf Refining Company, discussing the county judge's decision to regarding the N. E. Fielding's plea of privilege. It cites several prior cases and ordinances relating to the circumstances of the cause.
Back to Top of Screen