Hardin-Simmons University Library - 405 Matching Results

Search Results

Cause No. 10940-Sheriff's Sale, September 14, 1926

Document certifying a sheriff's sale in Eastland, Texas. The sale is part of the judgement cause no. 10940, J. L. Chapman, commissioner vs. W. L. Morris and Mrs. W. L. Morris.

Date: September 14, 1926

Item Type: Legal Document

Cause No. 11551: Plaintiff's Petition]

Document in cause no. 11551, Tomlinson, Paschall & Colvin vs. The Independent Torpedo Company, detailing the complaints of Mollie Lee Tomlinson, W. R. Tomlinson, Crigler Paschall, and J. D. Colvin against the Independent Torpedo Company. The plaintiffs seek recourse for damage to their oil well in Erath County, Texas by the shooting done by the Independent Torpedo Company.

Date: unknown

Creator: Chastain & Judkins

Item Type: Legal Document

[Cause No. 11687: Agreement to Accept Testimony of John Thompson]

Document in cause no. 11687, Jake L. Hamon, Jr. et al. vs. United States Torpedo Company, stating the attorneys of the plaintiffs and defendant agree that the testimony of John Thompson, taken by L. D. Hillyer, is admissible in the cause.

Date: unknown

Item Type: Legal Document

[Cause No. 11687: Deposition of J. H. Rapp]

Document in cause no. 11687, Jake L. Hamon Jr. vs. United States Torpedo Company, transcribing the deposition of Jack H. Rapp. Rapp's testimony discusses his association with the United States Torpedo Company and his shooting of an oil well in Eastland County, Texas.

Date: October 16, 1925

Creator: Cunningham, Tom J.

Item Type: Legal Document

[Cause No. 11687: Notice of Deposition of L. D. Hillyer]

Document in cause no. 11687, Jake L. Hamon, Jr. et al. vs. United States Torpedo Company, providing notice to the plaintiff about the deposition of L. D. Hillyer. The notice includes the questions posed to Hillyer which discuss Hillyer's transcript of John Thompson's testimony.

Date: unknown

Creator: Sayles & Sayles

Item Type: Legal Document

[Cause No. 11687: Oral Deposition of B. C. McDonald, October 17, 1925]

Document in cause no. 11687, Jake L. Hamon Jr. vs. United States Torpedo Company, transcribing the deposition of B. C. McDonald. McDonald recounts his recollections regarding the shooting of an oil well by J. H. Rapp in Eastland County, Texas. There is a receipt from the United States Torpedo Company included in the document.

Date: October 17, 1925

Creator: Cunningham, Tom J.

Item Type: Legal Document

[Cause No. 11687: Plaintiff's Second Original Petition]

Document in cause no. 11687, Jake L. Hamon, Jr. and Frank R. Ellis vs. United States Torpedo Company, describing Hamon and Ellis's complaints of the torpedo company and listing the damages they claim they are entitled to. The suit regards damage to Hamon's and Ellis's oil well in Eastland County, Texas caused by a representative of the United States Torpedo Company.

Date: 1925~

Creator: Sayles & Sayles

Item Type: Legal Document

[Cause No. 11687: Plaintiff's Supplemental Petition]

Document in cause no. 11687, Jake L. Hamon, Jr. et al. vs. United States Torpedo Company, stating that the United States Torpedo Company is liable for negligence.

Date: unknown

Creator: Sayles & Sayles

Item Type: Legal Document

[Cause No. 12096: Original Answer of Defendant, W. Parmill]

Document in cause no. 12096, O. M. England et al. vs. Edwin B. Cox et al., detailing W. Parmill's answer to the plaintiff's petition. The answer denies the alleged trespass and states that the plaintiff's complaint is regarding events more than two years previous to the filing of the suit.

Date: March 2, 1926

Creator: Stringer, S. D.

Item Type: Legal Document

[Cause No. 12096: Plea of Privilege of Defendant John Sayles]

Document in cause no. 12096, C. M. England et al. vs. Edwin B. Cox et al., in which John Sayles asserts he is not a resident of Eastland County, Texas and pleads his privilege to be sued in the court of his county of residence, Taylor County, Texas.

Date: February 27, 1926

Creator: Sayles & Sayles

Item Type: Legal Document

[Cause No. 1988: Appellant's Motion for Rehearing]

Document in the cause no. 1988, Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Company vs. W. O. Rainwater, detailing the appellant's arguments for rehearing the cause. It lists prior cases that support their motion and the errors in the process of the court. This copy appears to be a draft and has editing marks and correction in pencil.

Date: 1940~

Creator: Sayles & Sayles

Item Type: Legal Document

[Cause No. 1988: Appellant's Motion for Rehearing]

Document in cause no. 1988, Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Company vs. W. O. Rainwater, discussing the Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Company's reasons for requesting a rehearing. It states that the court erred in remanding the cause and lists several prior cases to support the company's argument.

Date: 1940~

Creator: Sayles & Sayles

Item Type: Legal Document

[Cause No. 1988: Appellant's Motion to File Supplemental Transcript]

Document in cause no. 1988, Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Company vs. W. O. Rainwater, in which the Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Company requests to have a corrected transcript filed in the cause. The motion discusses the question of jurisdiction for the cause and lists prior cases to support the oil company's argument.

Date: 1940~

Creator: Sayles & Sayles

Item Type: Legal Document

[Cause No. 1988: Appellant's Motion to File Supplemental Transcript]

Date: 1940~

Creator: Sayles & Sayles

Item Type: Legal Document

[Cause No. 1988: Appellant's Reply to Appellee's Motion For Rehearing]

Document stating the appellant 's reply to the appellee's motion for rehearing in cause no. 1988, Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Company vs. W. O. Rainwater. The reply references the cases Clonts vs. Johnson and Texas & N.O.R. vs. Whisenant as the basis for their appeal.

Date: 1940~

Creator: Sayles & Sayles

Item Type: Legal Document

[Cause No. 1988: Appellant's Reply to the Appellee's Motion to Dismiss Appeal]

Document in cause no. 1988, Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Company vs. W. O. Rainwater, detailing the Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Company's response to Rainwater's motion to dismiss the appeal.

Date: November 21, 1939

Creator: Sayles & Sayles

Item Type: Legal Document

[Cause No. 1988: Appellee's Brief]

Document in the cause no. 1988, Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Company vs. W. O. Rainwater, stating the appellee's, W. O. Rainwater's, position in the cause and presenting several prior cases to support his position.

Date: 1940~

Creator: Smith, Gilbert

Item Type: Legal Document

[Cause No. 1988: Appellee's Motion for Rehearing]

Document in cause no. 1988, Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Company vs. W. O. Rainwater, detailing the history of the cause in lower courts, assignments of error, propositions, and prior cases supporting Rainwater's motion.

Date: 1940~

Creator: Smith, Gilbert

Item Type: Legal Document

[Cause No. 1988: Appellee's Motion for Rehearing]

Date: 1940~

Creator: Smith, Gilbert

Item Type: Legal Document

[Cause No. 1988: Appellee's Reply to Appellant's Motion for Rehearing and Appellant's Motion for Writ of Certiorari]

Document in cause no. 1988, Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Company vs. W. O. Rainwater, countering the oil company's motion for rehearing the cause. The document lists the events in the cause, Rainwater's rebuttal of the reasons put forth by the oil company, and prior cases which support Rainwater's argument.

Date: 1940~

Creator: Smith, Gilbert

Item Type: Legal Document

[Cause No. 1988: Brief of Appellant and Assignments of Error, Propositions, Statements, Authorities, and Arguments]

Document in cause no. 1988, Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Company vs. W. O. Rainwater, containing a statement of the nature and result of the suit, and listing the errors of the court. This document appears to be a draft and there are editing marks and corrections made in pencil.

Date: 1940~

Item Type: Legal Document

[Cause No. 1988: Brief of Appellant and Assignments of Error, Propositions, Statements, Authorities, and Arguments]

Document in cause no. 1988, Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Company vs. W. O. Rainwater, containing a statement of the nature and result of the suit, and listing the errors of the court.

Date: 1940~

Item Type: Legal Document

[Cause No. 1988: Motion for Writ of Certiorari to Perfect the Record]

Document in cause no. 1988, Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Company vs. W. O. Rainwater, in which the oil company states that the transcript is imperfect. The motion lists a number of documents that were omitted from the transcript by the clerk of Jones County Court and requests a writ of certiorari.

Date: April 24, 1940

Creator: Sayles, Jack

Item Type: Legal Document

[Cause No. 1988: Motion of Appellant to File Brief]

Motion from the appellant, Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Company, to file their brief of appeal. The document lists the reasons for missing the appointed deadlines for filing their appeal as a mistake made by the attorneys, and requesting that the court not penalize their client.

Date: 1939-11~

Creator: Sayles & Sayles

Item Type: Legal Document

Hardin-Simmons University Library - 405 Matching Results

Search Results

Add Filters

Applied Filters

Cause No. 10940-Sheriff's Sale, September 14, 1926

Cause No. 11551: Plaintiff's Petition]

[Cause No. 11687: Agreement to Accept Testimony of John Thompson]

[Cause No. 11687: Deposition of J. H. Rapp]

[Cause No. 11687: Notice of Deposition of L. D. Hillyer]

[Cause No. 11687: Oral Deposition of B. C. McDonald, October 17, 1925]

[Cause No. 11687: Plaintiff's Second Original Petition]

[Cause No. 11687: Plaintiff's Supplemental Petition]

[Cause No. 12096: Original Answer of Defendant, W. Parmill]

[Cause No. 12096: Plea of Privilege of Defendant John Sayles]

[Cause No. 1988: Appellant's Motion for Rehearing]

[Cause No. 1988: Appellant's Motion for Rehearing]

[Cause No. 1988: Appellant's Motion to File Supplemental Transcript]

[Cause No. 1988: Appellant's Motion to File Supplemental Transcript]

[Cause No. 1988: Appellant's Reply to Appellee's Motion For Rehearing]

[Cause No. 1988: Appellant's Reply to the Appellee's Motion to Dismiss Appeal]

[Cause No. 1988: Appellee's Brief]

[Cause No. 1988: Appellee's Motion for Rehearing]

[Cause No. 1988: Appellee's Motion for Rehearing]

[Cause No. 1988: Appellee's Reply to Appellant's Motion for Rehearing and Appellant's Motion for Writ of Certiorari]

[Cause No. 1988: Brief of Appellant and Assignments of Error, Propositions, Statements, Authorities, and Arguments]

[Cause No. 1988: Brief of Appellant and Assignments of Error, Propositions, Statements, Authorities, and Arguments]

[Cause No. 1988: Motion for Writ of Certiorari to Perfect the Record]

[Cause No. 1988: Motion of Appellant to File Brief]